RIAA : Moeder gehandicapt ? Dan maar de 10 jarige dochter !

[Robbe]

"The latest target of the RIAA's ire is a 10-year-old girl in Oregon, who was 7 when the alleged infringement occurred, and whose disabled mother lives on Social Security. In Atlantic v. Andersen, an Oregon case that was widely reported in 2005 when the defendant counterclaimed against the RIAA under Oregon's RICO statute and other laws, the defendant's mother sought to limit the RIAA's deposition of the child to telephone or video-conference. The RIAA has refused, insisting on being able to grill the little girl in person. Here are court documents (PDF)."

Het zoveelste geval waar RIAA aantoont dat ze haar bestaansrecht te danken heeft door haar beruchtheid om alles en iedereen een proces aan te doen. Of maw. ze doen het op z'n SCO's.

[t-town]

dat noem ik nu een regelrechte schande!!
iemand meerderjarig aanklagen (oke)
maar een meisje van tien!!!! die beseft dat nog niet eens!!

[Braindamage]

Sja, de rest van de wereld kan roepen dat het een schande is, er is niemand die hen een strohalm in de weg legt.
En de rechters die zo'n rechtzaak geldig verklaren en willen doen, die zijn al even goed bezig ...
De wetten zijn er om ons te beschermen en het gerecht is er om ervoor te zorgen dat deze wetten worden nageleefd... Maar dit gaat al niet meer over beschermen van mensen

[meon]

even volledig offtopic, die userbar van userbase ...
't lettertype waarin userbase geschreven staat is ITC Officina Sans
Want da van u klopt niet echt lijkt me

[Braindamage]

even volledig offtopic, die userbar van userbase ...
't lettertype waarin userbase geschreven staat is ITC Officina Sans
Want da van u klopt niet echt lijkt me

was een beetje moeilijk om alle lettertypes af te gaan tot ik de juiste vond, maar ik zal het direct fixen, merci voor de tip

[EDIT] Aangepast

[Bossie]

Nog iets interessants over RIAA !

Code: Selecteer alles

RIAA’s weak attempts refused by universities

They have been on a high-profile campaign to get college students that the RIAA believes have been involved in illegal file trading to settle lawsuits against them at a “discount”. As part of this strategy, the company has tried to enlist universities to help them identify and turn over the names of offending students. But it’s heartening to see that some universities aren’t spinelessly acquiescing to the RIAA’s demands. The University of Wisconsin has told the RIAA that it has no obligation to rat its students out unless it’s compelled to do so by a subpoena. Meanwhile, the University of Nebraska has told the RIAA that it can’t help them identify many of the students accused of file trading. The school’s system changes a computer’s IP address each time its turned on, and it only keeps this information for month. After that month, the school has no way of associating an IP address with a computer or its user.

The RIAA is angry about this, and a spokesman for the group criticized the university for not understanding “the need to retain these records”. This is a ridiculous complaint. The university doesn’t have a need to retain these records, and there’s no reason it should do so out of some obligation to the RIAA. If there were any doubt that the university is really irritated by the RIAA’s requests, it has requested that the RIAA pay the university to reimburse its expenses from dealing with this (lol). If all of this back and forth sounds familiar, it’s because it very closely resembles what happened a few years ago when the RIAA tried getting ISPs to share data on their users. Fortunately, the ISPs stood up for their users and told the RIAA to get lost. It’s too bad the group didn’t seem to learn its lesson.

Bron : Techdirt

[BungaMan]

Als ze niks proberen hebben ze zowiezo al niks he.